THE last days of the war in May 2009 in North Sri Lanka are just painful memories for M10, an injured ex-Tamil Tiger young woman combatant, who is now reunited with her sister’s family in Batticaloa district after spending 11 months in an army detention center. She recalls the heart-wrenching scenes of human suffering in Puthikkudiyiruppu, in the North’s Wanni region, as she fled the battlefield:
I saw babies, less than a year old, dying in indiscriminate shelling of civilian areas. The shells were propelled from multi-barrel rocket launchers and shrapnel hit lots of people. I saw a busload of civilians with children blown apart by a shell…As we were fleeing the shelling, together with the civilians, there were literally waves of people dying behind us…When I see my sister’s children, I think of the children in the last days of the war…
There is strong evidence gathered by the UN and international human rights organizations that international norms were violated by both the Government of Sri Lanka forces and the LTTE when they caused huge numbers of civilians to be trapped in the conflict zone, resulting in large-scale death and destruction (International Crisis Group 2010). The respected University Teachers for Human Rights (UTHR) in Jaffna, quoting witnesses, documented that the strategy used by the LTTE in Puthikkudiyiruppu was to station disabled suicide cadres with explosives in civilian bunkers, with instructions to explode themselves when they spotted large groups of soldiers coming their way (University Teachers for Human Rights 2009, p. 81). According to UTHR, this prompted the Sri Lankan army to run their heavy vehicles over the bunkers without any regard for civilian lives, thus burying alive huge numbers of people. These gross violations of the Geneva Conventions in the concluding stages of the war have not gone unnoticed in the international community, which has pressured UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon to appoint, in late June 2010, a panel of experts to advise him on possible violations of humanitarian law by the Sri Lankan military.
Not Objects of Charity
M10 – who lost her left leg in a 1995 battle in the Wanni region – surrendered herself at the Omantai military checkpoint in the closing days of the war after fleeing the heavy shelling on Puthikkudiyiruppu with civilians. There she was immediately taken to Pampaimadu Camp for interrogation by Sri Lankan army intelligence and the Criminal Investigation Department (CID) of the police force. A year later, in late April 2010, M10 was released and recalled how she was sent back to Batticaloa:
After about one year of intense repetitive interrogation by army intelligence and the CID, I was told that I would be released. There were about 20 girls like me. We were asked to get in a military truck and after we all got in, the back of the truck was covered with a large tarpaulin. We could not see where we were being driven. After several hours the truck stopped and my name was called out. I knew I was in Batticaloa as the surroundings looked familiar. Then I saw my sister and her children run towards me. I shouted perria aka (big sister) and we all embraced and cried. There was a CID officer who accompanied us. He warned me not to talk to anyone, or else I would be in trouble.
The truck then drove off. I felt that I had just been dumped into uncertainty. My sister is poor; I am disabled; so how is she going to look after me? No NGO came to talk to me in my sister’s place, except for the police who drop by every week to check up on me.
M7, like M10, is an injured ex-Tamil Tiger young woman combatant who surrendered at the Omantai checkpoint in the closing days of the war. In April 2010 she was released after a year in Cheddikulam camp, where the CID interrogated her. She graphically explains how she was blinded in her left eye during a battle in Killinnochi in 1998: “I saw my eye-ball on the forest floor after I was hit by shrapnel and then passed out.” M7 recalls how she tried to look for a job in Batticaloa after the army left her in her mother’s house:
My father passed away when I was in the jungle. Now my mother has to look after my six younger sisters. I did not want to be an extra burden to my mother because of my disability, and so I traveled to Batticaloa town with my three disabled [ex-LTTE] friends. We registered ourselves at the IOM [International Organization for Migration] office and asked whether there were any jobs for disabled young women, like us. After taking our details the IOM officer told us that they would contact us if anything turned up, and then asked us not to come back to the office to make enquiries. We were hurt.
The IOM programme in Batticaloa and other parts of the East, funded by the US government, says it “provides information and counseling to former fighters, referring them to vocational training, psychosocial support and employment opportunities” (Embassy of the United States 2009). Some participants, with appropriate experience and skill sets, also receive small grants to help them start their own business in their local communities. Mehreteab (2007, p. 13) offers a word of caution for dealing with disabled ex-combatants when he points out that many have little education, few skills and poor health in societies where it is already difficult to start a small enterprise or find employment to generate adequate income to achieve a moderate standard of living.
Disabled ex-combatants, more so female ex-combatants, are one of the most difficult to reintegrate in the absence of specific medical and psychosocial care in communities. Due to their disability they are unable to generate any income without intensive training and rehabilitation (Mehreteab 2007). The International Labour Organization (ILO) in its guidelines on disabled ex-combatants warns DDR planners against treating them as “objects of charity” and adds that these ex-combatants “do not want to depend on families and communities to sustain them…[and] wish to become economically and socially active in their civilian communities and avoid being a burden on society” (International Labour Organization 1997, p. 166).
Array of Ministries and Bureaucratic Entities
Sri Lanka’s National Action Plan for the community reintegration of ex-combatants – which is supported by donors – does include disabled fighters and states unequivocally “the equality of assistance…does not preclude the need to provide specialized interventions to specific needs groups like the disabled…” (Ministry of Disaster Management and Human Rights 2009, p. 4). But herein lies the problem. The responsibility for implementing the reintegration of ex-combatants is delegated to an ever-expanding array of ministries and bureaucratic bodies, ranging from the Ministry of Disaster Management and Human Rights; four state institutions within the Ministry of Defence – namely Public Security, Law and Order, Terrorist Investigation Department and Military Intelligence Corps — to the Ministry of Justice and Law Reforms and the office of the Commissioner General for Rehabilitation, most of them acting independently of each other resulting in fragmentation of policy. At the provincial level DDR policy is implemented by under-funded provincial councils, which were formed following constitutional amendments in 1987.
To make matters worse, Sri Lanka’s Ministry of Defence (MOD) has the ability to ride roughshod over DDR plans and promotes the idea that DDR is only a security measure and should be limited to removing all dangerous elements from society. More to the point, the MOD requires that resettlement and reintegration must be interwoven with the elimination of the long-range offensive capabilities and disarmament of the LTTE (Muggah 2008, p. 154). If that is the case, then disabled enemy ex-combatants in the eyes of the MOD fall in the category of potentially less violent former troublemakers and will not receive the funds required to support their community reintegration.
But if disabled ex-combatants are given the opportunity, they can demonstrate resourcefulness and a commitment to a new life, as how M10 puts it:
I want to learn new skills and I want to learn English. I don’t want to think of the past. I’m now a civilian…and I want to make the best out of it.
Community Based Rehabilitation for Disabled Women LTTE Ex-Combatants?
The Association of Women with Disabilities is the only women’s organization in Sri Lanka addressing the needs of civilian women with disabilities. They are located in the North Central province and work with other women’s NGOs involved in development and human rights activities to promote inclusion, access and participation of women with disabilities in mainstream activities. However, this NGO does not work with disabled women ex-combatants. For disabled ex-service combatants and their families, the Rana Viru Seva Authority (RVSA) looks after their socio-economic integration. The RVSA is a semi government organization working under the Presidential secretariat in close collaboration with the private sector. Obviously none of these facilities will be made available to ex-LTTE combatants – sworn enemies of the Sri Lankan army servicemen and women.
Nonetheless, there is a protective mechanism in Batticaloa for disabled women ex-combatants through the female-kin-based matrilineal and matrilocal kinship organization that is discussed more in chapter six.
Twenty-one-year-old injured ex-Tamil Tiger woman combatant M9, who was blinded by shrapnel in a 2007 battle with the Sri Lankan army in the Wanni region, is an orphan adopted by her neighbour, whom she calls perria amah (eldest aunty). M9 talks of the kinship and care she receives:
My perria amah and her sisters in her family look after me. They cook for me and also help dress me. They look out for me when I go to the well and have my daily bath. To keep my mind active, they read me newspapers and books every day. I do not want to be a burden to them, but they keep assuring me that we are all sisters and need to help one another. My wish is that some NGO could help me learn some skills so that I can be independent financially. My perria amah’s family is poor and I would like to help them too.
Being in a literate society with nothing to do can give rise to idleness, uncertainty and despair from the lack of a horizon. A holistic rehabilitation approach is needed, including the important aspects of vocational training for the disabled, occupational therapy and psychosocial counseling or rehabilitation (Mehreteab 2007). Lessons can be learned from Nepal’s community based rehabilitation (CBR) interventions. This approach can enable the disabled ex-combatants to live with their families and work in their community while benefiting from their extended family networks. CBR interventions involve working with the sectors that provide support services to disabled ex-combatants and working within the community to promote the inclusion of people with disabilities in schools, training centers, work places, leisure and social activities (Mehreteab 2007).
But NGO workers remain skeptical that a CBR approach for ex-LTTE combatants will ever be adopted in Sri Lanka. For one, the Ministry of Defence is only pre-occupied with those they still consider ‘dangerous’. An NGO worker in Batticaloa puts this succinctly:
The disabled ex-Tamil Tiger fighters no longer pose a threat to the government. So why would they want to spend money on them? They have their disabled ex-servicemen to worry about. It is the former active LTTE combatants that scare them. The disabled former LTTEs cannot create trouble and if their family networks cannot provide for them, the government will happily place these disabled ex-fighters in welfare homes. That is the reality and it is sad.
Filed under: Conflict, Sri Lanka | 2 Comments »
Overview is a time for composure and contemplation. As a result of profound introspection, a hidden force reveals itself, and may influence others without their being aware of it. Do not underestimate the power of such a subtle force. 

